Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:27:25 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 02/29/2012 08:03 PM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
Can you maybe snip us a
> portion of the part about paleo, William? Otherwise, this is odd at
> best.
It's right here:"The date of the end(s) of the paleolithic age could
tell us much of what paleofood is/was/should be."
Ok, I'll do your thinking for you.
Assume that the paleolithic ended, then what caused the end?
Assume that paleoman had not the technology to freeze Siberian mammoths
in mud with fresh tropical veggies stuck between their teeth, raise
mountain ranges, increase the sea level by 200 feet over the whole earth
(and more for long enough to leave a petrified plywood ship high on a
mountain), move the geographical pole by ~45º of latitude, lots more
that I've forgotten.
These events are odd enough to get the attention of true scientists,
whose works then are suppressed by tier two pretend scientists.
It's odd indeed that nobody has come up with a date for these events;
McCanney seems to feel that dating is not his field and others are
evidently suffering from iodine deficiency/bromine poisoning.
Guesses, anyone? Speculation? Divination? Anything?
William
I killfile those who post hostile brainfarts.
|
|
|