Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:21:50 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John,
The issue here is communication, not your narrow definition of radio.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 08:44
Subject: Re: schedule
> Because that's not what radio's all about. Look up radio in the
> dictionary.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 4:26 AM
> Subject: Re: schedule
>
>
>> With this amount of interest in talking to each other, why not do an echo
>> link conference? I see they have conferrences up to 500 people. That
>> aught
>> to be enough. No issues with propigation, location, or having antennas
>> or
>> HF privilleges. Since we seem reluctant to make schedules that exclude
>> areas of the country, let's bend over, hold our ankles, and actually talk
>> to
>> each other. No qrm, no qrn, no foreign broadcast.
>
|
|
|