Yup, Butch, that's correct. You can do this for the forward power,
reflected power, and SWR functions, although, as others have mentioned on
the list already, the sWR tone seems to be the most useful for basic tuning
purposes with an outboard tuner.
73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
> NOt sure if this has been mentioned, but you can hold in I think the
> forward button for a couple seconds and I think it will go to a variable
> pitch tone for tunoing. I don't have mine in line to check, but think
> that is right.
> 73
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
> open Node 3148
> Las Vegas
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Steve Forst wrote:
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> All I ever use is 5 or 10 watts am, cw, or RTTY. Just listen for the
>> swr
>> tone to drop to it's lowest steady tone and you are all set. I'm sure
>> that
>> you found the volume control on the front of the TW-1. Of course if you
>> have any sort of hearing problem, it could possibly make it harder to
>> tell
>> the difference in the tones.
>>
>> 73, Steve KW3A
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 9:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
>>
>>
>>> Steve:
>>>
>>> I figured out the value of that SWR tone pretty quickly when I was
>>> experimenting around earlier today.
>>>
>>> Now, a question:
>>>
>>> What power would you recommend for tuning?
>>>
>>> Again, I tried 5 or 10 watts initially, but maybe was relying too much
>>> on
>>> the forwrad and reflected power tones at first.
>>>
>>> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 7:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Tom,
>>>>
>>>> You shouldn't have to use that much power to tune up, and it really
>>>> isn't
>>>> great for the rig.
>>>>
>>>> While using the forward and reflected power tones is pretty cool, all
>>>> you
>>>> really need to use is the swr tones for tuning an antenna. The
>>>> forward
>>>> power tones are used more by guys tuning amps for max power.
>>>>
>>>> Have fun with the new toy.
>>>>
>>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 6:30 PM
>>>> Subject: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, again, everyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just wanted to let you know that I spent this afternoon getting
>>>>> acquainted
>>>>> with my new TW1, and it's an absolutely amazing piece of equipment!
>>>>>
>>>>> The sWR readings, as well as the forward and reflected power
>>>>> indications
>>>>> are
>>>>> extremely helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I have figured out how to use the TW1 with my old manual MFJ
>>>>> versatuner.
>>>>>
>>>>> It took me a while, but I did notice that, in order to tune an antenna
>>>>> effectively, I had to use close to 100 watts, in order to get clear
>>>>> tone
>>>>> indications of high forward power, low reflected power, and low SWR.
>>>>>
>>>>> I assume this is normal?
>>>>>
>>>>> On a related note, I have another question:
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed that the TW1 has the capability to take readings on 6
>>>>> meters.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am actually now thinking of ordering a TW2, and that has 6 meters
>>>>> also,
>>>>> doesn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is six meters better on the TW1 or TW2, or doesn't it really matter?
>>>>>
>>>>> 73 from Tom behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
