BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:02:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (116 lines)
    Well, Steve, I don't think I have a hearing problem yet, although the 
XYL might claim otherwise sometimes!  HI!  HI!

Anyway, I'll keep it down to 5 or 10 watts, and work with the SWR tone 
indicator as you suggest.  Then, I can fine tune things with the power tones 
if needed.

It's better for the radio anyway, as you noted earlier.

Thanks for your patience and good explanations as always.

73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: TW1 is absolutely terrific!


> Tom,
>
> All I ever use is 5 or 10 watts am, cw, or RTTY.   Just listen for the swr
> tone  to drop to it's lowest steady  tone and you are all set. I'm sure 
> that
> you found the volume control on the front of the TW-1.  Of course if you
> have any sort of hearing problem, it could possibly make it harder to tell
> the difference  in the tones.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 9:41 PM
> Subject: Re: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
>
>
>>    Steve:
>>
>> I figured out the value of that SWR tone pretty quickly when I was
>> experimenting around earlier today.
>>
>> Now, a question:
>>
>> What power would you recommend for tuning?
>>
>> Again, I tried 5 or 10 watts initially, but maybe was relying too much on
>> the forwrad and reflected power tones at first.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 7:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
>>
>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> You shouldn't have to use that much power to tune up, and it really 
>>> isn't
>>> great for the rig.
>>>
>>> While using the forward and reflected power tones is pretty cool, all 
>>> you
>>> really need to use is the swr tones   for tuning an antenna.   The
>>> forward
>>> power tones are used more by guys tuning  amps  for max power.
>>>
>>> Have fun with the new toy.
>>>
>>> 73, Steve KW3A
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 6:30 PM
>>> Subject: TW1 is absolutely terrific!
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi, again, everyone.
>>>>
>>>> I just wanted to let you know that I spent this afternoon getting
>>>> acquainted
>>>> with my new TW1, and it's an absolutely amazing piece of equipment!
>>>>
>>>> The sWR readings, as well as the forward and reflected power 
>>>> indications
>>>> are
>>>> extremely helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I have figured out how to use the TW1 with my old manual MFJ
>>>> versatuner.
>>>>
>>>> It took me a while, but I did notice that, in order to tune an antenna
>>>> effectively, I had to use close to 100 watts, in order to get clear 
>>>> tone
>>>> indications of high forward power, low reflected power, and low SWR.
>>>>
>>>> I assume this is normal?
>>>>
>>>> On a related note, I have another question:
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that the TW1 has the capability to take readings on 6 meters.
>>>>
>>>> I am actually now thinking of ordering a TW2, and that has 6 meters
>>>> also,
>>>> doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>> Is six meters better on the TW1 or TW2, or doesn't it really matter?
>>>>
>>>> 73 from Tom behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2