BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shaun Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:54:40 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
hmmm. is yours the plus 3b?
ah. yes I remember now. the hand mics were the road king and the m plus 
3. I use to own an m plus 3. the desk mics were the plus 3b and the 
super side kick. I always loved the audio of the super side kick.

Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude


On 21/03/2008 12:49 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to 
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> that's not a hand mic, it's a desk mic.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:42 AM
> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
> 
> 
>> hmmm. a turner plus 3 hand mic on a kenwood 120s.
>> that would be a rather ballsy sound.
>> I had a friend back in my chocolate box days, had one of those on a
>> yaesu ft101e and that thing had balls. don't think he ever got his ham
>> license but god that radio use to sound nice..
>> he would use a little bit of processor along with just enough gain on
>> the mic itself to get that grunt I'm just about salivating over. and
>> you'd know when he keyed up too because he had this destinctive clunk.
>>
>> Shaun
>> web sites:
>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>> skype: brailledude
>>
>>
>> On 21/03/2008 12:36 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>> I just got my TS-120 on the air, I'll use it to talk to the locals on 10
>>> meters at night for a while to make sure everything's as it should be, 
>>> I'm
>>> very happy with it so far though with the turner plus 3 mic on it. I get
>>> great reports so far.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:27 AM
>>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>
>>>
>>>> reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
>>>> am curious to see if the same principal applies.
>>>> I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that era,
>>>> hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
>>>> wanting to be sold. hi hi.
>>>>
>>>> Shaun
>>>> web sites:
>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that, 
>>>>> and
>>>>> some others I know but I know not all.
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
>>>>> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>>>>>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power down 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>>>>>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly, if
>>>>>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>>>>>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>>>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Shaun
>>>>>> web sites:
>>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>>
>>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>>
>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2