BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
"BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range." <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 1998 10:19:53 EST
Reply-To:
"BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range." <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
From:
Mary Delaney Krugman <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Here is an inquiry I am forwarding from a historic preservation commission
Chair (in GA, I think).  Defining the criteria for degree of deterioration
that would rise to a violation of "preventive maintenance" or "demolition by
neglect" provisions is not an uncommon problem for HP commissions.  Can anyone
provide some information or experience in various states?

Mary Krugman
__________________________
Mary Delaney Krugman Associates, Inc.
Historic Preservation Consultants
Montclair, NJ
________________________________
FWD:  Demolition by Neglect

>Has anyone successfully pursued a house not maintained within a
>historic (zoning) district?
>
>We have a house with rotted fascia boards, falling off shutters, and a
>rotting front porch (Federal-style, with posts on top, now sitting at crazy
>angles...)
>
>I want to be sure that this falls within the generally accepted definition of
>'demolition by neglect' before pursing legal action.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2