BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:21:50 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
John,

The issue here is communication, not your narrow definition of radio.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 08:44
Subject: Re: schedule


> Because that's not what radio's all about. Look up radio in the 
> dictionary.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 4:26 AM
> Subject: Re: schedule
>
>
>> With this amount of interest in talking to each other, why not do an echo
>> link conference?  I see they have conferrences up to 500 people.  That
>> aught
>> to be enough.  No issues with propigation, location, or having antennas 
>> or
>> HF privilleges.  Since we seem reluctant to make schedules that exclude
>> areas of the country, let's bend over, hold our ankles, and actually talk
>> to
>> each other.  No qrm, no qrn, no foreign broadcast.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2