Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:21:32 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
no. what I mean is you can break me with the last word you transmitted.
Let's say you missed part of the address but you have the addressee's name
and amateur call. Just say the last you have which is the amateur call.
This is the audio version of a technique known as qsk which is also known as
full breakin on cw. 73- pat kk3f
----- Original Message -----
From: "gary" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: a new approach to sending traffic
> Hi Pat, Gary in KB2YAA WNY. When you say between groups, do you mean
> between the header and text and at the end of the body of text and the
> signature?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pat Gormley" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 5:27 PM
> Subject: a new approach to sending traffic
>
>
>> Recently our section traffic manager w3yvqhas been showing us a new =
>> technique which is used on phone but is similar to the qsk method we =
>> use on cw. Before I begin a message or series of message such as a book
>> =
>> I tell the receiving station that I'm listening between groups. If the =
>> receiving station needs fills all he has to do is say the last work he =
>> copied completely. This is also helpful when conditions have been =
>> marginal like they've been lately. 73- pat kk3f
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.1/1728 - Release Date: 10/16/2008
> 7:38 AM
>
|
|
|