BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:39:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (106 lines)
Tom,

I understand that Elmer's glew and fingernail polish maybe functional 
substitutes.

Fred

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 7:11 AM
Subject: Re: trouble with high mark


>    Hi, Folks.
>
> Well, you are certainly confirming my experiences, and if someone could 
> give
> me a good substitute for high mark, like LOC-dots, please let me know.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Louis Kim Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 8:27 PM
> Subject: Re: trouble with high mark
>
>
>> Amen.
>>
>> I have never had satisfactory dealings with that company.  N E V E R !!!!
>>
>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>
>>
>>
>> At 09:31 AM 10/5/2008 -0400, you wrote:
>>>I would further suggest people not patronize Maxi-Aids. They're
>>>scheisters. With a long record of scheisterism.
>>>On Oct 5, 2008, at 9:26 AM, T Behler wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi, folks.
>>> >
>>> > I don't know whether to classify this as a complaint or an
>>> > observation, but
>>> > I thought some other listers might benefit from what I'm about to
>>> > share.
>>> > And, I consider this to be on topic for the list, because we use the
>>> > product
>>> > often to label our equipment and accessories.
>>> >
>>> > Anyway, I bought some of what was supposed to be "new and improved"
>>> > highmark
>>> > from Maxi-aids several months ago, and have been extremely
>>> > disappointed in
>>> > what I received.  As you may know, the original  highmark is fairly
>>> > thick,
>>> > and forms a nice marking on whatever you're trying to label, as long
>>> > as you
>>> > give it sufficient time to harden.
>>> >
>>> > Well, this "new and improved" stuff is for the birds!  For one
>>> > thing, it's
>>> > almost like a liquid--really kind of runny, and certainly not thick
>>> > like the
>>> > original  stuff.  And, I found that, after letting it dry for 3 or
>>> > four
>>> > hours, it was tstill soft to the touch, and immediately came off the
>>> > plastic
>>> > knobs I was trying to label.
>>> >
>>> > I have a mind to call Maxi-aids and complain, but I'm not sure I'll
>>> > have the
>>> > time, at least for the next few days, because I'll be on professional
>>> > travel.
>>> >
>>> > Suffice it to say:  I'm really disappointed, and would suggest
>>> > others not
>>> > buy the new and improved stuff.
>>> >
>>> > 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>
>>>--
>>>Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
>>>Phone: (814) 746-4502 or 888-75-BUDDY
>>>Harnessing the power of Online Spending and Everyday Shopping to
>>>Change Lives: See how, Together, We Can Change the World:
>>>http://www.powermall.info
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>Checked by AVG.
>>>Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.7.5/1705 - Release Date: 10/3/2008
>>>8:18 AM
>>
>> Louis Kim Kline
>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>> Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>> Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2