Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:17:49 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have. I had a virus bring a system completely down to the point that it
had to be wiped clean and reloaded while I was running Norton. They aren't
a quarter as good as they claim that they are.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 12:19 AM 7/28/2008 -0400, you wrote:
>Robert,
>
>While low resource usage is good, it's just as important to know how
>effective the program is as an anti-virus tool. Much as I hate Norton's
>inaccessibility and high resource usage, I must say that I have never had a
>virus on any of my systems with Norton. If I can't get the same results
>from NOD32, then it really doesn't matter how accessible the software is, or
>how little resources it uses.
>
>Steve
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Robert Clark" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 21:55
>Subject: Re: off topic virus programs
>
>
> > Yes John, true. I have used Norton, McAfee, AVG, avast, and can say
> > that NOD32 is so easy on the resources you dont know its running.
> >
> > *---* *---* *---* *---* *---*
> > Official sign near door: Door Alarmed
> > Handprinted sign nearby: Window frightened
> > Robert & Dreamer Doll ke7nwn
> > Newport, Oregon
> > N24C 8/2000 Hookup
> > [log in to unmask]
> > http://webpages.charter.net/dog_guide/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.5.6/1579 - Release Date: 7/29/2008
>6:43 AM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
|
|