BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Eyes-free iPod]
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:17:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Supposedly they don't bother each other anymore though there was a time back 
when that they did but supposedly those days are long since past.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: Eyes-free iPod]


> Naturally it does, but I was wondering if the jfw intercept was what was
> giving me trouble with window-eyes.  Maybe their are circumstances when 
> one
> intercept messes up the other screen reader.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2