BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:17:53 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (76 lines)
I don't know, but wifi I don't think would work out well.  With E skip or
with the top of the sunspot cycle and the way those freqs are I don't
know.  What about teh VHF high freqs?  The lower ones couldn't be usefull
for any kind of trunking either for the same reasons, but the VHF high
could.





On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:

> Is there anything on the FCC site about the low vhf allocation?  I
> cannot imagine this for cell but  could it work for some extended wyfi?
> Just thinking tactually. =20
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>
> uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for when
> everything is mandated to go digital?  I'm mainly talking about 2-3-4
> and 5-6.  I know the 700 portion is going for public safety useage, and
> it's either P-25 digital  or penSky.  the 470-512 MHz range is already
> being used in some places by public safety in digital and analogue and
> conventional and trunking.  Someone was wonderin if the very low VHF TV
> freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham bands?  I.E. TV
> channels
> 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters?  I think taht would be wishfull
> thinking though.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>
> > Yes.  =3D20
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> >
> > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF or=20
> > VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in case the=20
> > local club members want me, or move NTS messages up there but I don't=20
> > sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
> > Subject: unused frequencies
> >
> >
> > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about=20
> > > anything=3D20 above =3D3D 10 meters.  I will say that I hae noticed =
> not=20
> > > much going on =3D
> > on
> >
> > > 10-20.  40 a=3D3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if =
> this=20
> > > is =3D
> >
> > > normal for this time=3D3D of year and the current stage of the sun=20
> > >spot=3D20  cycle.
> > >=3D20
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2