Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:24:30 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I did that for a lot of years, when I didn't know I could get it any other
way. I'm kind of glad those days are over though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: qst
> Fred,
>
> Nothing says you can't just buy the print copy, scan it in, and read (or
> skip) the ads to your heart's content.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 16:04
> Subject: Re: qst
>
>
>> Good Idea, Howard, so how much would you guys be willing to pay to get
>> the
>> adds? If a scanner can read them and someone would be willing to clip
>> them
>> it ought not to be a difficult problem to overcome.
>>
>> Fred Olver [log in to unmask]
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 3:02 PM
>> Subject: Re: qst
>>
>>
>>>I know, but isn't it time to change the free matter regs? They can
>>>change
>>> the price of stamps any time they want. 1934 is not 2008. If
>>> advertizors
>>> sponcer closed captioning, maybe they would sponcer audio discription or
>>> making their materials accessible. Besides, didgital downloads don't go
>>> through the postal mail, so the regulations don't apply.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|