BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:06:49 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (190 lines)
Right, I knew tha.  The thing is that Sony has blueray technology, which I
guess is better, as was the case with Beta.





On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Lou Kolb wrote:

> Yes, time will tell and by the way, I meant HD-DVD not HS-DVD.  Lou
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:24 PM
> Subject: Re: another digital TV question
>
>
> > Well, we'll see about how well it is doing, and will continue to do.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 5:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: another digital TV question
> >
> >
> > > I'm not sure about that.  They're already discontinuing HS-DVD but
> Blueray
> > > seems to be thriving.  XYL wants to get one now that we have a flat
> screen
> > > TV.  Lou
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 3:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: another digital TV question
> > >
> > >
> > >> Well, I hate to say this, but I think blueray DVD is headed in the same
> > >> direction as Beta.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > They still make some good professional products but some of the
> > >> > consumer
> > >> > items are miss marketed or too proprietary.  I am thinking of their
> > >> > early process for transferring data to Mini Disks.  It should have
> been
> > >> > possible from the get go to do this in something faster than real
> time.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > =20
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you!
> > >> > Brett Winchester   KD7JN
> > >> > [log in to unmask]
> > >> > ICBVI -- Reading Services
> > >> > P O BOX 83720
> > >> > 341 W WASHINGTON STREET=20
> > >> >
> > >> > BOISE IDAHO  83720-0012
> > >> > 208-334-3220-104
> > >> > 208-639-8386 DID
> > >> > 208-334-2963 fax
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > =20
> > >> >
> > >> > =20
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > >> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
> > >> > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:02 AM
> > >> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > >> > Subject: Re: another digital TV question
> > >> >
> > >> > Well, then it will be a way s then, but that I think is coming, and
> is
> > >> > not a matter of if but when.  Sony made some good products like
> > >> > Betamax,
> > >> > but they shot themselvs in the foot by not marketing it correctly.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Anthony Vece wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Everyone;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Those Sony products in the 70's and early 80's were untouchable!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I would put any of the Sony analog radio tuners against any
> > >> > > digital=20
> > >> > > tuner made today.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, I heard recently that the FCC will not be requiring the
> > > little=20
> > >> > > Mom/Pop radio stations to go digital because the equipment is much
> > >> > > too
> > >> > expensive.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > That's what I heard anyway.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> > >> > > [log in to unmask]
> > >> > > ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > >> > > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> > > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:17 AM
> > >> > > Subject: Re: another digital TV question
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Well, I remember my grandfather's watchman TV he got for
> > >> > > > Father's=20
> > >> > > > Day in 1984!  It was a hefty $250 then, and it was great
> picture=20
> > >> > > > quality and a sensative little TV on both VHF/UHF!  I wonder
> > >> > > > then=20
> > >> > > > when will radeio be mandated to be all digital?  If TV is
> going=20
> > >> > > > radio must be right around the corner!
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Louis Kim Kline wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Hi Jeff.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Probably not in the short run, but eventually, as analog
> radio=20
> > >> > > >> becomes a thing of the past, sure.  I predict that in ten
> years=20
> > >> > > >> you'll have pocket HD radios that will tune AM/FM/TV and
> > >> > > >> they'll=20
> > >> > > >> only cost you about $250, gbut that'll probably be worth
> about=20
> > >> > > >> $12.00 in today's dollars!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> 73, de Lou K2LKK
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> At 04:11 PM 4/10/2008 -0400, you wrote:
> > >> > > >> >Hi everyone, I know we've talked about digital TV, but with
> > >> > > >> >the=20
> > >> > > >> >switch in
> > >> > > >> >mind and with all of the equipment that   is out there now that
> > >> > can tune
> > >> > > >> >TV channels will there be anything that will support digital
> > >> > > >> >TV=20
> > >> > > >> >audio in the way of ham and other commercial radios that for
> > > some=20
> > >> > > >> >people all they want is TV audio?
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> >--
> > >> > > >> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >> > > >> >Checked by AVG.
> > >> > > >> >Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.12/1372 - Release
> Date:
> > >> > > >> >4/10/2008 5:36 PM
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Louis Kim Kline
> > >> > > >> A.R.S. K2LKK
> > >> > > >> Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask] Work e-mail: =20
> > >> > > >> [log in to unmask] Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2