BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:29:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Tom,

I've compared the receiver on my 480 with my Icom R75, and the R75 is 
quieter, which makes the signals stand out more, especially when they're 
weak.  I also wish the 480 had a wider transmit SSB filter, which would make 
the audio a little less restricted, and I think they could have done a bit 
better with the DSP.  Trouble is, it's probably the best radio on the market 
in terms of ease of operation, which is why I'm willing to put up with its 
other shortcomings.  Then again, I'm not a serious contester or DX chaser. 
If I were, I'd probably want something better, and I might be willing to 
give up some accessibility.

Steve

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 23:04
Subject: Re: 746PRO


>    Very well said, Steve, and that represents my overall assessment
> exactly.  This is why buying a rig is often something that involves
> compromises, which is what makes the decision so difficult.  You'd think
> that, for the money we pay for these rigs, you could have more all-around
> better features than we sometimes get.
>
> Anyway, I guess that's part of the challenge.
>
> I do have to say, though, that I've been very very impressed with the 
> TS480
> so far, and I believe its receiver comes at least somewhat close to the
> quality of the 746 receiver, although admittedly, I'll have to play with 
> the
> TS480 much more before I can conclude that for sure.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:58 PM
> Subject: Re: 746PRO
>
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> In my opinion, Icom receivers perform better than Kenwood or Yaesu
>> receivers, in terms of sensitivity, signal to noise,  and dynamic range.
>> It's frustrating that each of the big three companies does well in
>> different
>> aspects, but none of them have radios that excel in all aspects.  You
>> can't
>> beat Kenwoods for accessibility and high quality audio.  Icoms have
>> fantastic receiver specs, but don't do as well with audio quality.  Yaesu
>> radios seem to have more bells and whistles than anyone else, but have 
>> the
>> worst track record for accessibility, and don't seem to do as well
>> technically as Icoms.
>>
>> Steve
>
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2