If we had such power.....if we could  do anything by or amount of faith, or 
could by some means hold on to something....why would we need God in the 
first place?  A few years ago a new lady came up to me in church.  She told 
me her name and said she wanted to pray for me.  I agreed, know and 
believing in the power pf prayer.  She then offered a prayer for my healing, 
the restoration of my sight.  After her prayer, there we were, she as she 
had been before, and I was still blind.  She said we'd need to pray more 
about this.  I responded that I had already asked God about this, and that I 
had given my life to Him, he was the one in control.  If, and when he chose 
to give me my sight was His decision, I did not choose to continually ask 
him the same thing over and over again.
She did not like my answer.
I think that sometimes people  live their whole lives thinking  all of the 
"If-onlies"  if only.....I was.....if only I had......if only I 
lived.......they miss a lot of happiness and  lose a lot of the Peace Jesus 
came to give them because they have not fitured out how to be content in the 
moment.

I liked your article........you are sure a funny writer.  Funny to be sure, 
but true none the less.


Thanks for sharing.



Rhonda
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2008 3:35 PM
Subject: It's My Fault, Faith I mean.


> Here is my latest article that for sure will get me into big time trouble
> with lots of people.  It is also long, about 8 pages, but whose counting.
>
> Phil.
>
> So It's My Fault Again?
>
>
> By Phil Scovell
>
>
>
>     Yes, I did it again!  I turned on the radio and dialed up a
> Christian broadcast.  I couldn't help it.  It was late, about
> midnight, I wasn't sleepy yet, and besides, it was my favorite
> preacher's voice coming through the speaker.  His program was
> just coming on the air so I settled back to listen to his daily 15
> minute broadcast.  Within five minutes, I was spitting, rending my
> clothes, and casting dust into the air.  "Why me, God?  Why do you
> let me hear this stuff?  I don't even have my own radio or TV
> program to expose the false teaching, Lord.  What gives?"
>
>     He was preaching at a Bible conference at his own ministry
> facilities so I have no idea how old this sermon was but it
> couldn't be too old because he commented on his thirty years plus
> of ministry, and I know how old he is because he is my age.
> Plus, I have many of his tapes and I have heard him hundreds of
> times.  Like I said, he is, still is, my favorite preacher because
> I agree with his interpretation and application of the Scriptures
> so often.
>
>     His basic theme of the message was healing.  He was trying to
> explain why some people don't keep, the key word here is keep,
> their healing.  This, for me, even as a tongue talking, weirded
> out Charismatic, has always bothered me.  I mean, everything God
> ever has done, up until now apparently, has been permanent.  For
> example, the creation of all things, people he raised from the
> dead didn't lose there healing but later died natural deaths, the
> blind never went back to being blind, Lepers stayed healed, the
> woman with an issue of blood did not have to return for more help
> from Jesus, the lame continued walking, Lepers remained whole, the
> deaf kept hearing, and need I continue by listing all our Lord's
> miracles?  So what is this Charismatic thing that you can lose
> your healing?  Of course, the only answer that can be used is that
> it is our fault.  Right?  I mean, we done lost our faith.  Right?
> come on, now, you know the routine.  It doesn't sound like God to
> me no matter how you explain it.
>
>     In this message, as is the case with so many messages by
> "Holy Spirit filled" Charismatics, if a healing doesn't work,
> especially one in which they have prayed, laid hands on, and
> those whom they have just chased demons out of, then your faith is
> the problem; not theirs.  I mean, there faith is obviously working
> and yours ain't.  Next time you are told that, ask for your money
> back and walk out of the place because you just been lied to.  I
> mean, somebody is short changing the true nature and character of
> Jesus so get away from them.  Now!
>
>     In this particular sermon, the preacher told the story about
> a woman who had been miraculously healed of whatever she had.  I
> can't recall now if it was cancer or just what but it was bad,
> inoperable, and something she would likely die of, again, as I
> recall the story that he told.  Regardless of what it was, it was
> very serious; that much I remember.  However, as is the case with
> so many who are healed, she lost it.  Dad gum it.  Can't God do
> anything right?
>
>     He said that he asked the lady what she did the next morning
> when she realized, whatever the disease or malady was that had
> returned, and she said, "Well, I made an appointment and went in
> to see the doctor."  He informed her that this was her first
> mistake, that is, she went to the doctor.  He further said that
> she wasn't using her faith, as she once had, when she had been
> healed and thus she lost her healing.  In other words, you are on
> your own even if you are a born again Christian.  What happen to
> the preacher's prayer of faith over you anyway?  Why is it all of
> the sudden, your fault, and not his?  Where is his responsibility
> as "A Man Of God?"  Did he lose his faith when you lost your
> healing?  Come on!  What's up here?
>
>     My personal problem with this felonious theology is that I
> can't find any Scripture to confirm it.  When I look at Jesus, or
> even His own disciples, I find that people got healed and it was
> permanent.  Never once is there any record that anybody lost their
> healing because of a lack of faith.  You will, of course, find
> passages where Jesus said, "Your faith hath made you whole," but
> you won't find them losing their healing later or did the Holy
> Spirit, the author of the Bible, just leave those negative things
> out?  He sure didn't leave out the negative things in the Old
> Testament record.  I can also point out many places where the Holy
> Spirit reports through the inspired writers of the New Testament,
> the times Believers were accused of failure due to their unbelief.
> Did you hear it?  Due to their unbelief!  The Lord's own disciples
> of our Lord were horribly guilty of this.  (See Matthew 13:58,
> Mark 6:6, Mark 16:14 and especially examine very carefully, the
> story of the demon possessed son found in Matthew 17:14-21).  If
> you are too lazy to look up the passages on your own, then skip
> reading now and just go back to listening to the dumb butt
> preacher who still is leading you around by the nose.  That's
> easier than checking the bible out anyhow.
>
>     These same people who believe you can lose your physical
> "healing," normally likewise believe that one can lose their
> salvation in exactly the same way.  This is even in spite of the
> fact the Bible clearly states that "every man is given the
> measure of faith," but apparently, that faith can be lost and you
> can be lost again.  Does this mean Jesus takes that faith away or
> just that it is our job to hold on to it so we don't lose our
> salvation?  Which is it?  Unfortunately, if losing your salvation
> is true, I must inform you that you can never ever be born again,
> or saved, a second, third, or fourth time.  In short, you be up a
> shallow creek without a boat or a paddle.  Why?  Because Hebrews
> 10:12 through 26 says the following, and read the whole lengthy
> passage for context, please.  Why?  Because it is how you
> interpret Scripture and thus learn to apply what you read.
>
> #12  But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for
> ever, sat down on the right hand of God;
> #13  From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his
> footstool.
> #14  For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are
> sanctified.
> #15  Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after
> that he had said before,
> #16  This is the covenant that I will make with them after those
> days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in
> their minds will I write them;
> #17  And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.
> #18  Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering
> for sin.
> #19  Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the
> holiest by the blood of Jesus,
> #20  By a new and living way, which he hath consecrated for us,
> through the veil, that is to say, his flesh;
> #21  And having an high priest over the house of God;
> #22  Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of
> faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and
> our bodies washed with pure water.
> #23  Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without
> wavering; for he is faithful that promised;
> #24  And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to
> good works:
> #25  Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the
> manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the
> more, as ye see the day approaching.
> #26  For if we sin willfully after that we have received the
> knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for
> sins."
>
>     Let me point out what should be the obvious in this passage.
>
> First, verse 12 says, "But this man, after he had offered one
> sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God."
> It is pretty clear to me that this verse identifies the person of
> Jesus Christ as being our supreme sacrifice for sin.  The
> terminology used of, "this man, after he had 'offered one
> sacrifice' for sins 'for ever,' makes it absolutely clear that His
> sacrifice for sin was once and for all; for ever.  "Once" and "for
> ever" is pretty final; wouldn't you say?  Oh, I'm sorry.  I
> forgot.  Unless, of course, you can lose your salvation.  Some
> God.  He can't even save his own without man's help, apparently.
>
>     Secondly, verse 14 repeats the absolute truth of the prior
> theological statement by saying, #14  "For by one offering he hath
> perfected for ever them that are sanctified."  My!  What's this?
> How many offerings did Jesus offer?  (He is the offering, in case
> you missed It.  It says, "For by one offering."  Just one, not two
> or three or more.  This clearly means, if you lose your salvation
> for being a dumb bell and not watching your step, you cannot go
> back for seconds because only "one" offering has been given.
>
>     It doesn't stop there.  The same verse says the following:
> "he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified."  Perfected?
> What in the world is He talking about?  It can't mean really
> perfect, can it? Yes, it literally means, in the Greek, to be made
> perfect or complete.  If it really means perfected, you can't lose
> it, or can you?  It sounds like perfect means perfect to me but
> then what do I know; I just read the Bible and take it for what it
> says in plain English and forego trying to read something else
> into it to fit my personal theology.  Besides, if we are
> "sanctified," since when does God remove that state of
> sanctification once it is given?  Oh, I see.  We can lose our
> sanctification as well?  Too bad the Greek word for "sanctify," in
> this passage means (to be made holy, complete, purified, and
> guiltless).  In short, there is no room to interpret
> sanctification in terms of that which is temporarily given to some
> one until they screw up, sin, or stop acting like a child of the
> King.  Boy, you almost had me worried there for a second.
>
>     Thirdly, and I'm sorry but it would be wise to quote all
> three verses collectively in order to see it more clearly, this
> passage again says:  #15  "Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a
> witness to us: for after that he had said before,
> #16  This is the covenant that I will make with them after those
> days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in
> their minds will I write them;
> #17  And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more."
>
>     The "Holy Ghost" is our witness that these things are true.
> That's good.  So that means we cannot claim we lost the Holy
> Spirit in the process, unless, of course, you simply don't know
> how to read.  I suppose, if the Holy Spirit is less than God, He
> could, in fact, stop witnessing, stop sealing our salvation, and
> just move on to do something else but that isn't in the Bible
> either.  Honestly.  We are having a terrible time getting away
> from that bible stuff, aren't we?
>
>     Next, in verse #16, we are flatly told, this is a covenant.
> What?  Well, shoot, if you can lose your salvation, then a man can
> be uncircumcised after being circumcised.  ouch!  Right?  That's
> the covenant of God given to Abraham, whose seed we are, (See
> Romans 4:11-13), and if you have the time, read all of Romans
> Chapter 2 concerning who is a Jew and who is circumcised and who
> is of faith.  That will clear up any confusion you might have.  Of
> course, if you don't take time to read those passages, you likely
> are still going to believe a lie.  Unless, of course, you are
> unawares of what circumcision is physically and what it means
> Biblically.  In that case, physically, I mean, check a good
> medical book out of your local library.  Your Bible explains the
> theological aspect of circumcision but then again, you'll have to
> read it to find out about it.  If you won't do that, read your
> Bible, I mean, you likely won't go to the library either so just
> forget what I suggested.
>
> Verse #16 continues by saying "saith the Lord, I will put my laws
> into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them."  He,
> Jesus, the Holy Spirit bearing witness, puts His law into our
> hearts?"  Furthermore, He, Jesus, the Holy Spirit bearing witness,
> writes it in our minds?"  Wow!  I guess, if one can lose their
> salvation, God has a big huge rubber eraser some place in the
> universe He must have to use occasionally.  No, I'm not trying to
> be funny.  He writes it what Revelation calls "The Lamb's Book Of
> Life,"  or just "The Book Of Life."  Get it?  "Life?"  Not death?
> (See Revelation 3:5, 13:8, 17:8, 20:12, 20:15, 21:27, and 22:29).
> That last reference is the only one I am aware of whereby one can
> lose their eternal salvation and this is committed by adding, or
> changing, or altering, God's Word.  So be careful.  Oh, yes.
> Philippians 4:3 also mentioned "The Book Of Life," but if all the
> other references don't apply, that one won't either so it is up to
> you and what you believe, I guess.
>
>     So, what in the Sam Hill are we then going to do with Hebrews
> Chapter 12 and verse #17 that says, "their sins and iniquities
> will I remember no more."  If you lose your salvation, you know,
> the thing the Holy Ghost bears witness of, and comes to dwell,
> literally, inside of our newly recreated spirit, (See 2
> Corinthians 5:17 and John 14:14-20), which even says that Jesus
> dwells within us, but I digress, repeating myself, what are we
> going to have to do to explain this promise away?  You can use, of
> course, if your agenda is to make your theology fit what you say
> you believe, that God has a failing memory relating to salvation,
> or some lame thing like that, but no matter what you say, you
> can't make God remember something He says He can't remember
> concerning your sin he has totally forgotten about.  Well, unless
> you don't believe the Bible but I thought you claimed you were a
> Bible Believer.  If you have further doubt, explain to me what
> Psalm 103:12 is talking about.  "As far "as the east is from the
> west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us."  That's
> right; you can't explain it any other way than truthfully.  You
> either take God at His Word or you don't.  Yes, we are getting
> dangerously close to why people "lose their healing," so hold on a
> minute.
>
>     It is actually verse #18 that really rattles the, (you can
> lose your salvation), or (healing), outfit.  Let me quote verse
> #17 with it, though, so you'll get the contextual feel for the
> full meaning and impact of the verse.  Here we go.  Strap yourself
> in.
>
> #17  "And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.
> #18  Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering
> for sin."
>
>     Woe horse!  But don't stop here.  Let's jump all the way down
> to verse #26 to finish the thought of the theology being depicted
> within the complete text.
>
> #26  "For if we sin willfully after that we have received the
> knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for
> sins."
>
>     Bingo, Brother!  Do you see it?  No more offering for sins if
> you lose your salvation.  Step lightly, young man, or you might
> end up in hell even if you once were on your way to Heaven.  Man,
> is this weird theology or what?  And people say I'm crazy.
>
>     Let me say it one more time so you don't overlook it.
> According to these verses, if you are born again, and sin
> willfully again, you cannot ever be born again a second time
> because Jesus cannot go back to the cross and die for you and your
> sins all over again and then be bodily resurrected on the third
> day.  You are done stuck going to hell period; it is final.  Yes,
> some people believe you can get saved, born again, every day, if
> that's what it takes, but they must be reading a different Bible.
> In that case, run!
>
>     Let me cut to the chase, therefore, and ask you this
> question.  Is our salvation a covenant we have with God, the Holy
> Spirit bearing witness of such, or is our salvation something we
> can change once it is God applied?  If you can read, you already
> know the answer.  If healing, therefore, is also a covenant
> relationship with God, and it is, can we then lose that, too,
> just like our salvation?  Do you see why I started with the true
> interpretation of the doctrine of our eternal salvitic
> relationship with God?  They go together;  they cannot be
> separated.
>
>     Yes, yes, I know.  You have one very important question to
> ask so go ahead, right now, and get it off your chest.  I'm
> listening.
>
>     "Well, if we can't lose our salvation and we shouldn't be
> able to lose our physical miraculous healing, what about this
> woman who went to the doctor that the preacher talked about on the
> radio?"
>
>     Excellent question.  The woman, in this story, was told she
> lost her healing because she lost her faith.  Sorry, Charlie.
> Ain't in the Bible, no how.  No, she didn't stop believing either.
> No, it wasn't a big lack of trust in God either.  "Then what was
> it?"  In whom was this woman believing when she "received her
> healing?"  Take a wild guess.  The preacher who told her about
> this miracle she could have if she just believed?  You are getting
> warmer.  In whose words did she believe, do you suppose, when she
> "got her miraculous healing which she later lost?"  In this story,
> the preacher, my favorite preacher, told her to go back to doing
> what she did when she got healed.  No!  No! No!  That's what got
> her to losing her healing in the first place.  Why in God's name
> would you instruct her to do what she did before?  Healing isn't
> of you or me or any hair brained theologically screwed up radio
> preach or pastor.  Salvation, and healing, is of the Lord, stupid.
> Come on.  In whom do you believe?  The preacher?  The pastor?  Me?
> Some dumb Christian book called the Purple Propelled Life?
> Promise Holders?  Some men's organization called the Advanced
> Christian Porno Problem Solvers who meet on the internet, charging
> thirty dollars a month for membership dues, and meets once a week?
> Give me a break.  For crying out loud, to whom are you listening
> to in the first place?  What happened to believing God and His
> eternal, unchanging, eternal, Holy Word just like it reads?  I
> swear, if the government band all Christian broadcasting
> tomorrow, I think I'd shout, "Glory.  Back to church we go."  At
> least then, foolish theology will only be spread by word of mouth,
> or, God forbid, by New York Times best selling books.
>
>     Let me suggest something at this point.  From now on, anybody
> who is going to lay hands on you for a physical healing, ask them
> if they, the key word here is they, will give you a 100 percent
> guaranteed promise that you will, first, be healed, and second, it
> will be permanent.  I guarantee, and promise you, that they will
> refuse to lay hands on you for healing if you ask that question
> first.  What if preachers and pastors suddenly started taking
> responsibility for those with whom they pray?  What if they blamed
> themselves for a person "losing their healing," instead of blaming
> the person they prayed for?  Let me prove something to you right
> here and now.
>
>     Let's use this same favorite preacher of mine as an example.
> My young son has his third degree black belt in Karate.  He is a
> judge at tournaments, he has been an instructor at a Karate
> school, he has trophies, a broken foot with a steel plate and six
> screws in it, he has been hospitalized with concussions, and he
> has, for that matter, done a little bleeding along the way, too.
> So, during one of these healing services, following the message of
> course, few ever get healed miraculously before the preaching, and
> especially before the offering, what if I went forward to be
> prayed for and healed.  I am totally blind with two artificial
> eyes.  I can take them out to prove it.  Let's say I bring along
> my son with the black belts in Karate.  Ok?  So far; so good.
> Now, when the preacher comes up to lay hands on me for a for real
> recreative miracle, you know, the ones like Jesus often did, let's
> say that I ask him if he, the preacher, believes I am going to be
> receiving my sight with brand new eyeballs.  You know, just like
> the blind man in John Chapter 9 who let Jesus spit in the dirt,
> make clay, and slap the gooey mess right in his empty eye sockets.
> How weird is that.  Sort of like when Jesus stuck his fingers in
> the deaf man's ears, spit and touched his tongue, of all things,
> and the old boy started hearing.  That's in Mark Chapter 7 if you
> are worried about what I said.  But, then, maybe he lost his
> hearing again later.  That Jesus!  I tell you what.  Sometimes I
> wonder if He knows what He is doing without all these preachers
> telling Him first what to be doing and saying.  Now back to my
> story.
>
>     I already know I believe so I want to know if the preacher
> truly believes and will stake his ministerial reputation on what
> he says he believes and what he is about to pray.  Ok?  I mean,
> the disciples did so why not those of us who preach and teach that
> we know what the Bible says.  By the way, I tell the people with
> whom I pray that I promise they will experience healing and that I
> guarantee it will be permanent, so what's the big deal here?  No
> guts?  No glory: personal glory?  I'm confused at your
> reluctance.
>
>     So, now.  If, by chance, I can get him to go this far, I will
> then lift his leg so my son can, with one hand, or one foot, break
> his leg.  Then I will ask him to show me his faith or does he wish
> me to call an ambulance just before my son breaks his other leg.
> "Not fair," you say?  Why not?  Faith is faith, or are you now
> going to tell me there are degrees, or levels, of faith that work
> only under certain situations?  Get a life and call me back when
> you have something worth saying, or when they remove your cast.
> For now, your teaching is not just weak, it isn't even Biblical
> and stop asking for my offering on your radio program until you
> teach the truth about who God really is.  While you are at it,
> return all the money you've receive thus far from people who
> believe you were telling them the truth, too.  Otherwise, get a
> job.
>
>
> It Sounds Like God To Me.
> www.SafePlaceFellowship.com