BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: XMLOG - QRZ
From:
john vernaleken <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:40:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines) 
 Thanks

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: XMLOG - QRZ


>I saw a post today on the XMlog list about this.  It has happened at least
> once before where QRZ has made some  change and the XMlog author had to 
> make
> some change in the software for XMlog to lookup properly.  So it looks 
> like
> it has happened again and now Mike is aware of it so  there should be some
> change in the XMlog software soon.
>
> 73, Steve KW3A
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Vernaleken" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:06 PM
> Subject: XMLOG - QRZ
>
>
>> Is anyone having problens getting information from QRZ.COM when using=20
>> XMLOG? I was not having problens until tonight.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> John  KC2QJB
>>
>>
>>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2