me thinks we'll have to agree to disagree. best ever audio I heard aside
from an amateur radio what wasn't driven to buggery by a 10 4 good buddy
chicken band operator, was a turner super sidekick driving a ferris 5500
bass station.
if you didn't know any better, you'd swear it was an amateur radio, it
sounded that nice.
Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude
On 21/03/2008 12:58 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> Nope, mine is the original turner plus 3 which is the best sounding one of
> the series. Eats batteries, but sounds good while doing it.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:54 AM
> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>
>
>> hmmm. is yours the plus 3b?
>> ah. yes I remember now. the hand mics were the road king and the m plus
>> 3. I use to own an m plus 3. the desk mics were the plus 3b and the
>> super side kick. I always loved the audio of the super side kick.
>>
>> Shaun
>> web sites:
>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>> skype: brailledude
>>
>>
>> On 21/03/2008 12:49 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>> that's not a hand mic, it's a desk mic.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:42 AM
>>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>
>>>
>>>> hmmm. a turner plus 3 hand mic on a kenwood 120s.
>>>> that would be a rather ballsy sound.
>>>> I had a friend back in my chocolate box days, had one of those on a
>>>> yaesu ft101e and that thing had balls. don't think he ever got his ham
>>>> license but god that radio use to sound nice..
>>>> he would use a little bit of processor along with just enough gain on
>>>> the mic itself to get that grunt I'm just about salivating over. and
>>>> you'd know when he keyed up too because he had this destinctive clunk.
>>>>
>>>> Shaun
>>>> web sites:
>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 21/03/2008 12:36 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>> I just got my TS-120 on the air, I'll use it to talk to the locals on
>>>>> 10
>>>>> meters at night for a while to make sure everything's as it should be,
>>>>> I'm
>>>>> very happy with it so far though with the turner plus 3 mic on it. I
>>>>> get
>>>>> great reports so far.
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:27 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
>>>>>> am curious to see if the same principal applies.
>>>>>> I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that
>>>>>> era,
>>>>>> hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
>>>>>> wanting to be sold. hi hi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shaun
>>>>>> web sites:
>>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>>>>> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that,
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> some others I know but I know not all.
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>>>>>>>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power
>>>>>>>> down
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>>>>>>>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly,
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>>>>>>>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>>>>>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Shaun
>>>>>>>> web sites:
>>>>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>>
>>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
|
