Is there anything on the FCC site about the low vhf allocation?  I
cannot imagine this for cell but  could it work for some extended wyfi?
Just thinking tactually.  

-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: unused frequencies

uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for when
everything is mandated to go digital?  I'm mainly talking about 2-3-4
and 5-6.  I know the 700 portion is going for public safety useage, and
it's either P-25 digital  or penSky.  the 470-512 MHz range is already
being used in some places by public safety in digital and analogue and
conventional and trunking.  Someone was wonderin if the very low VHF TV
freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham bands?  I.E. TV
channels
2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters?  I think taht would be wishfull
thinking though.





On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:

> Yes.  =20
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>
> They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF or 
> VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in case the 
> local club members want me, or move NTS messages up there but I don't 
> sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
> Subject: unused frequencies
>
>
> > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about 
> > anything=20 above =3D 10 meters.  I will say that I hae noticed not 
> > much going on =
> on
>
> > 10-20.  40 a=3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if this 
> > is =
>
> > normal for this time=3D of year and the current stage of the sun 
> >spot=20  cycle.
> >=20
>