Hi Brett;
Do you think CDMA will be using this technology?
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett Winches" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Vacated tv channels
> You may be right Jeff, but with the error correction and encoding
> schemes who knows. If I had not been on a tech support call all
> afternoon with a client I would do some research. Perhaps Thursday.
> One new concept I am intrigued by is the fantacell which will be in the
> States in a year or late 2008. This will allow smaller cell linking to
> the larger cell towers to cover hard to reach areas now. =20
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:18 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Vacated tv channels
>
> I don't know, but wifi I don't think would work out well. With E skip
> or with the top of the sunspot cycle and the way those freqs are I don't
> know. What about teh VHF high freqs? The lower ones couldn't be
> usefull for any kind of trunking either for the same reasons, but the
> VHF high could.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>
>> Is there anything on the FCC site about the low vhf allocation? I=20
>> cannot imagine this for cell but could it work for some extended
> wyfi?
>> Just thinking tactually. =3D20
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: For blind ham radio operators
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:02 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>>
>> uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for=20
>> when everything is mandated to go digital? I'm mainly talking about=20
>> 2-3-4 and 5-6. I know the 700 portion is going for public safety=20
>> useage, and it's either P-25 digital or penSky. the 470-512 MHz=20
>> range is already being used in some places by public safety in digital
>
>> and analogue and conventional and trunking. Someone was wonderin if=20
>> the very low VHF TV freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham=20
>> bands? I.E. TV channels
>> 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters? I think taht would be wishfull
>
>> thinking though.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>>
>> > Yes. =3D3D20
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: For blind ham radio operators
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>> >
>> > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF=20
>> > or=3D20 VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in=20
>> > case the=3D20 local club members want me, or move NTS messages up=20
>> > there but I don't=3D20 sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
>> > Subject: unused frequencies
>> >
>> >
>> > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about=3D20=20
>> > > anything=3D3D20 above =3D3D3D 10 meters. I will say that I hae=20
>> > > noticed =3D
>> not=3D20
>> > > much going on =3D3D
>> > on
>> >
>> > > 10-20. 40 a=3D3D3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if =
> =3D
>> this=3D20
>> > > is =3D3D
>> >
>> > > normal for this time=3D3D3D of year and the current stage of the=20
>> > >sun=3D20 spot=3D3D20 cycle.
>> > >=3D3D20
>> >
>>
>
>
|
