BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Louis Kim Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:18:11 -0400
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (98 lines)
I'm sure that they will try to auction off the frequencies.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 06:17 PM 3/12/2008 -0400, you wrote:
>I don't know, but wifi I don't think would work out well.  With E skip or
>with the top of the sunspot cycle and the way those freqs are I don't
>know.  What about teh VHF high freqs?  The lower ones couldn't be usefull
>for any kind of trunking either for the same reasons, but the VHF high
>could.
>
>
>
>
>
>On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>
> > Is there anything on the FCC site about the low vhf allocation?  I
> > cannot imagine this for cell but  could it work for some extended wyfi?
> > Just thinking tactually. =20
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:02 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> >
> > uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for when
> > everything is mandated to go digital?  I'm mainly talking about 2-3-4
> > and 5-6.  I know the 700 portion is going for public safety useage, and
> > it's either P-25 digital  or penSky.  the 470-512 MHz range is already
> > being used in some places by public safety in digital and analogue and
> > conventional and trunking.  Someone was wonderin if the very low VHF TV
> > freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham bands?  I.E. TV
> > channels
> > 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters?  I think taht would be wishfull
> > thinking though.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
> >
> > > Yes.  =3D20
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> > >
> > > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF or=20
> > > VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in case the=20
> > > local club members want me, or move NTS messages up there but I don't=20
> > > sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
> > > Subject: unused frequencies
> > >
> > >
> > > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about=20
> > > > anything=3D20 above =3D3D 10 meters.  I will say that I hae noticed =
> > not=20
> > > > much going on =3D
> > > on
> > >
> > > > 10-20.  40 a=3D3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if =
> > this=20
> > > > is =3D
> > >
> > > > normal for this time=3D3D of year and the current stage of the sun=20
> > > >spot=3D20  cycle.
> > > >=3D20
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release Date: 3/12/2008 
>1:27 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2