BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 1 Mar 2008 04:28:19 -0500
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Hi.

I'm assuming that the TS120S was pretty much the same as the 
TS130S.  Basically, with the Kenwood MC50 microphone it was pretty decent, 
and it didn't do too badly with the Shure 444 or the 444D.  It had 
decidedly less punch with the Turner hand mic that I had (Turner 355C), and 
with a Shure 526T it sounded like crap.

Probably more than you wanted to know.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 01:57 PM 3/1/2008 +1100, you wrote:
>hahahaha. the radios I blew the bum outa were on air at the time. I was
>making some adjustments and I needed an ear a fair way away to inform me
>of any changes in the audio and well you get the idea.
>oh well, while I'm on it, what do people think about the tx audio of the
>old 120s, from what I remember of the things, they had some grunt even
>without any kind of compression or processing. even the 120v had some balls.
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.2/1305 - Release Date: 2/29/2008 
>6:32 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2