Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:39:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I did, now I actually have version 5.51
----- Original Message -----
From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: winamp
> John:
>
> Do you have version 5.35?
>
> That's the one I seem to be having trouble with.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: Kb8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:12 AM
> Subject: Re: winamp
>
>
>>I use the current version and don't have nay problems, but in the
>> installation just select the classic skin and you'll be fine. Only
>> problem
>> I
>> have is when I close winamp it takes aim out with it, but I went back a
>> few
>> versions once to see if that helped it and it didn't so I just stick with
>> the latest since I have no problems with it other than that which I have
>> absolutely no fix for.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>
>>
>>> Thanks, John.
>>>
>>> Are you guys having the best luck with winamp 5.13?
>>>
>>> Should I just do the basic or classic installation?
>>>
>>> Thanks, and 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 9:53 AM
>>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>>
>>>
>>>> oldversion.com has older versions of winamp
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|