19:14 27-11-2015, Paul Bartlett:
>[...] Vide mi essayo
>(anglesemente) "Thoughts on IAL SUccess"
>http://www.panix.com/~bartlett/thoughts.html . Iste re es plus
>importantissime que le theorias original de Gode e le IALA.
"and endless tinkering to strive ever closer to a supposed
"perfection" may actually impede use of any conIAL."
Very true. Multo ver.
(Mi interlingua pro le citation in anglese:
Sin fin rectificar e readjustar un lingua, per attinger un
perfection supposticie, pote de facto impedir le uso de ulle
lingua auxiliar constructe.)
«Would-be learners and users always find the ground shifting
under their feet with a language subject to endless tinkering and
supposed "improvements." »
Right.
(But admittedly, most of what I write in Interlingua myself, is
ABOUT Interlingua, or other languages.)
--
Ruud Harmsen, http://rudhar.com
--
Pro leger le archivos e pro modificar o cancellar le subscription:
http://listserv.icors.org/archives/interlng.html