Our set is only 5 years old, and it is not hd compatible. It would need
a converter box.
73s
Butch Bussen
wa0vjr
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, John Miller wrote:
> you won't need a converter box on any TV made in the last few years, since
> 2000 I believe it was, HD or not. I'm told HD is a complete waste of money
> by people who can see the picture, that's why I asked, I wasn't sure if you
> heard something I didn't about them.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:23 PM
> Subject: Re: looking for new tv.
>
>
>> Then, in the future if you do not have cable, you don't need to messss
>> around
>> with a converter box. And, I assume since his wife liked the picture,
>> she'd
>> get much more pleasure from an HD TV.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:15 PM
>> Subject: Re: looking for new tv.
>>
>>
>> Why would you make sure it was HD capable?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:11 PM
>> Subject: Re: looking for new tv.
>>
>>
>>> Butch,
>>>
>>> If I were going to get a new TV, I'd make sure it is HD capable. I saw a
>>> 26-inch LCD HD from Westinghouse, but I don't know whether you can
>>> independently access the menus through the remote. Certainly, you can't
>>> from
>>> the TV itself.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:12 AM
>>> Subject: Re: looking for new tv.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks. The one that died is a panasonic. Only 5 years old, and my wife
>>> likes it, but no crts made any more, and in Vegas, they want $200 just to
>>> knock on your door. ugg!!!
>>> 73s
>>> Butch Bussen
>>> wa0vjr
>
>
|