Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 May 2008 09:34:49 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
christ. that's abit of output. I could squeeze 150 out of my old 520 up
on 27 mhz but that was driving it for all it was worth.
Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude
On 16/05/2008 2:43 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> If I tune for max power with my TS-520 on 75, I can get 175 out of it. I was
> told to try to keep it no more than 125 out of those radios. that 175 is CW,
> it's tough to measure SSB power but I'd bet it's no lower, it's probably
> slightly more. I really don't think it should be that high.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: power mods for tube rigs.
>
>
>> How hard are you driving your 6146's on 75 meters? Those tubes are rated
>> at
>> 75 watts continuous carrier a piece. 90 watts on cw, and since the duty
>> cycle is so much less on SSB, they can be pushed even harder. If you are
>> running more than 200 watts on SSB, I want to see that radio. 6146B's are
>> rated on CW at 120 watts each, and 6146W's go at 150 watts a piece. Their
>> is no ts520 with the plate supply to do that.
>>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 3102 (20080515) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
|
|
|