hmmm. a turner plus 3 hand mic on a kenwood 120s.
that would be a rather ballsy sound.
I had a friend back in my chocolate box days, had one of those on a 
yaesu ft101e and that thing had balls. don't think he ever got his ham 
license but god that radio use to sound nice..
he would use a little bit of processor along with just enough gain on 
the mic itself to get that grunt I'm just about salivating over. and 
you'd know when he keyed up too because he had this destinctive clunk.

Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude


On 21/03/2008 12:36 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to 
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> I just got my TS-120 on the air, I'll use it to talk to the locals on 10 
> meters at night for a while to make sure everything's as it should be, I'm 
> very happy with it so far though with the turner plus 3 mic on it. I get 
> great reports so far.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:27 AM
> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
> 
> 
>> reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
>> am curious to see if the same principal applies.
>> I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that era,
>> hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
>> wanting to be sold. hi hi.
>>
>> Shaun
>> web sites:
>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>> skype: brailledude
>>
>>
>> On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that, and
>>> some others I know but I know not all.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
>>> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>>>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power down to
>>>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>>>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly, if
>>>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>>>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Shaun
>>>> web sites:
>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>
>>>
>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>
>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
>