Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:27:15 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
am curious to see if the same principal applies.
I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that era,
hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
wanting to be sold. hi hi.
Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude
On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that, and
> some others I know but I know not all.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>
>
>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power down to
>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly, if
>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>> thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> Shaun
>> web sites:
>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>> skype: brailledude
>>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
|
|
|