You may be right Jeff, but with the error correction and encoding
schemes who knows. If I had not been on a tech support call all
afternoon with a client I would do some research. Perhaps Thursday.
One new concept I am intrigued by is the fantacell which will be in the
States in a year or late 2008. This will allow smaller cell linking to
the larger cell towers to cover hard to reach areas now.
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:18 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Vacated tv channels
I don't know, but wifi I don't think would work out well. With E skip
or with the top of the sunspot cycle and the way those freqs are I don't
know. What about teh VHF high freqs? The lower ones couldn't be
usefull for any kind of trunking either for the same reasons, but the
VHF high could.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
> Is there anything on the FCC site about the low vhf allocation? I
> cannot imagine this for cell but could it work for some extended
wyfi?
> Just thinking tactually. =20
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: For blind ham radio operators
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jeff Kenyon
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:02 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: unused frequencies
>
> uHi everyone, what do you think they'll use the VHF TV channels for
> when everything is mandated to go digital? I'm mainly talking about
> 2-3-4 and 5-6. I know the 700 portion is going for public safety
> useage, and it's either P-25 digital or penSky. the 470-512 MHz
> range is already being used in some places by public safety in digital
> and analogue and conventional and trunking. Someone was wonderin if
> the very low VHF TV freqs could be poossibly an expansion of the ham
> bands? I.E. TV channels
> 2-4 could be an expansion of 6 meters? I think taht would be wishfull
> thinking though.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Brett Winches wrote:
>
> > Yes. =3D20
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: For blind ham radio operators
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Miller
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 1:09 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: unused frequencies
> >
> > They're pretty normal so far as I can tell. I don't do much on UHF
> > or=20 VHF either really, mostly I monitor the local repeaters in
> > case the=20 local club members want me, or move NTS messages up
> > there but I don't=20 sit and rag chew up there very often at all.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:01 PM
> > Subject: unused frequencies
> >
> >
> > > Don't know about 2 meters, really don't know anything about=20
> > > anything=3D20 above =3D3D 10 meters. I will say that I hae
> > > noticed =
> not=20
> > > much going on =3D
> > on
> >
> > > 10-20. 40 a=3D3D nd 80 seem to have action and I am wonderng if =
> this=20
> > > is =3D
> >
> > > normal for this time=3D3D of year and the current stage of the
> > >sun=20 spot=3D20 cycle.
> > >=3D20
> >
>
|
