BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:46:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Well, right off, if you do packet the way I do, there's no mailbox in the 
built in TNC's and they lack in a ton of settings. For APRS, packet cluster, 
and just general playing around and conversing they're alright but really, 
they're very barebones. The TNC in my TS-2000, for what I do, doesn't even 
compare with the KPC3+ I use on packet, in fact it wouldn't even make a good 
backup. For the Packet cluster, for DX spots, it's great and I know a few 
people using them on APRS which we can't really do, but really beyond that 
you're better off with a separate packet station if you're going to really 
be active on packet.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "matt v" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:24 PM
Subject: radios with and w/o tnc


> hi
> is there an advantage to these radios with tnc built in, other than the =
> obvious not having to buy a separate tnc.  anyone used one and what are =
> the advantages/disadvantages of these
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2