BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Winches <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:25:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (95 lines)
Do the math, 468/frequency in MHz equals half wave.  To be more accurate
300000000 over frequency equals the metric wavelength and if you want a
yaggie 5644 over frequency MHz equals the half wave for the driven
element.   


###
BRETT WINCHESTER  KD7JN 
[log in to unmask] 
208-639-8386
###


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of CHRISTOPHER SCHULTE
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: 6 meters

From what I understand, a six meter quarterwave isn't much bigger then a
two meter five eighths wave, I could be wrong on that, but that's what
I've heard.

----- Original Message -----
From: "matt / m and t enterprise" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: 6 meters


> next question; do i need a gigantic antenna for it or could i get by
with
> something more the size of my 2m antenna(of course i couldnt use that
> antenna but....)
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "CHRISTOPHER SCHULTE" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 12:21 AM
> Subject: Re: 6 meters
>
>
>> Six is a lot like ten and two and seventy centimeters.  You have a 
>> certain
>> portion of the band dedicated to weak signals, and sideband, and am,
and 
>> a
>> portion to fm.  The fm portion does have repeaters on it, but they're
not
>> nearly as popular there as they are on 2 meters.
>> 73,
>> Chris, w8cjs
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "matt / m and t enterprise" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 7:19 PM
>> Subject: 6 meters
>>
>>
>>> hi all,
>>> I might have mentioned this on here a time or 3, or just to some
certain
>>> =
>>> people, but I have always been curious to try 6m, since i knew there
was
>>> =
>>> such a band at least.  I of course am diing to(or was) to get on
70cm =
>>> too but thats not my question.  my question is, is 6m like 2 and 440
=
>>> where u go through repeaters or not?just wondering because all i
know =
>>> for repeaters around here are on 2m so not wanting to waste money,
would
>>> =
>>> it be worht it without a repeater?btw, i was thinking of not getting
a =
>>> rig for 440 right now for the same repeater issue, the closest on
that =
>>> band is like an hour plus away
>>> thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1210 - Release Date: 
>> 1/5/2008
>> 11:46 AM
>>
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2