Thanks, John.  Maybe I'll just un-install 5.35 and re-install it again 
with the classic option, and see what happens.

73 de Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: winamp


>I did, now I actually have version 5.51
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: winamp
>
>
>> John:
>>
>> Do you have version 5.35?
>>
>> That's the one I seem to be having trouble with.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler:  Kb8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>
>>
>>>I use the current version and don't have nay problems, but in the
>>> installation just select the classic skin and you'll be fine. Only
>>> problem
>>> I
>>> have is when I close winamp it takes aim out with it, but I went back a
>>> few
>>> versions once to see if that helped it and it didn't so I just stick 
>>> with
>>> the latest since I have no problems with it other than that which I have
>>> absolutely no fix for.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:09 AM
>>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>>
>>>
>>>>    Thanks, John.
>>>>
>>>> Are you guys having the best luck with winamp 5.13?
>>>>
>>>> Should I just do the basic or classic installation?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, and 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 9:53 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> oldversion.com has older versions of winamp
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>