BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:00:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Hi John;

Just be sure to leave the receive pre-amp on when your using vhf/uhf or the 
radio will be useless.

When the pre-amp is on you won't have any problem.

73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: ts2000


> I'm still very happy with the TS-570, but like I tell people. When you're 
> on
> the air every day, with NTS nets, DX'ing, rag chew with friends at night,
> sometimes you need new buttons to push. Or, like me, I'm  scaling back a
> little, trying to make more room though I'm eventually going to make less
> with the amp and all, but anyway, it's nice to use something different. 
> I've
> been using the TS-520 for the local rag chew on 10 meters lately which is
> great but when I rearrange things here and start up with my classes again, 
> I
> want 1 radio that goes everywhere that I can reach from my computer desk
> spot and the TS-2000 is it. I hardly use the UHF/VHF bands anyway so I 
> won't
> run it that much harder than I do the TS-570 now. Net control on a couple
> nets a week on 2 meters, maybe 1 QSO for 10 minutes or so every week or 2,
> nothing at all for that radio.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:10 AM
> Subject: ts2000
>
>
>> Oh I agree it is a good radio and I would never get rid of it but it 
>> would
>> =
>> be neat to play with something different.  In no way am I complaining
>> about=
>> what I have.  I am greatfull.
>>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2