Kathy,
Me and Adam don't have one.
Phil.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: Personal Opinion
> Well, there's always the belly button. Kathy
>
>
>
> At 01:26 PM 1/26/2008, you wrote:
> >Kathy,
> >
> >I was considering the nose ring but I have a better idea.
> >
> >Phil.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:15 AM
> >Subject: Re: Personal Opinion
> >
> >
> > > Phil,
> > > I take it that we're not talking the cheek or the ankle then? GRIN!
> > > Kathy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 12:16 PM 1/26/2008, you wrote:
> > > >Kathy,
> > > >
> > > >I already have a tattoo in a place where size makes no difference. I
> >got,
> > > >several years ago, a tattoo of a naked butterfly on top of my head
and
> >right
> > > >in the middle of my bald spot, I mean, my thin spot. Unless you are
> >taller
> > > >than I am, and can look down upon me, something many do already, you
> >can't
> > > >see it. The rest of the time, I wear my cowboy hat so it is covered.
> >The
> > > >only person who has ever seen it is my barber and he's a liberal
> >Christian
> > > >so he thinks it's cute. So do I but then what do I know. I will
refrain
> > > >from mentioning where I am considering getting the second tattoo.
> > > >
> > > >Phil.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 9:57 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Personal Opinion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Phil,
> > > > > About the tatoo, you might want to wait until your body is the
size
> > > > > and shape you want it to be. Changing body shape is bad for
tatoos.
> > > > > Kathy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 11:25 AM 1/26/2008, you wrote:
> > > > > >Kathy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >I knew I could count on you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Phil.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > > > >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 6:21 AM
> > > > > >Subject: Re: Personal Opinion
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Phil,
> > > > > > > The danglies would look great with the cowboy hat and boots.
You
> > > > > > > know, thought, to be truly biblical, you can't go to an ear
ring
> > > > > > > place and use one of those cute little guns, you're supposed
to
> >use a
> > > > > > > nail and a door post. I suppose that you could use a little
> >rubbing
> > > > > > > alcohol afterwords, to keep it clean. Good luck with that!
> > > > > > > Kathy
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > At 11:25 PM 1/25/2008, you wrote:
> > > > > > > >I am considering getting my ears pierced and was wondering
what
> >your
> > > > > >opinion
> > > > > > > >was related to a Christian man having his ears pierced? I've
> >heard
> > > >it is
> > > > > > > >Biblical based upon a slave wishing to stay with a master
> > > >permanently,
> > > > > > > >rendering is total life to the slave owner, and outwardly
> > > >demonstrating
> > > > > >his
> > > > > > > >allegiance to that man. An excellent spiritual picture of a
bond
> > > >slave
> > > > > >for
> > > > > > > >Christ. So, what do you think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >Phil.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
|
