ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Scovell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:26:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines)
Kathy,

I was considering the nose ring but I have a better idea.

Phil.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: Personal Opinion


> Phil,
> I take it that we're not talking the cheek or the ankle then?  GRIN!
> Kathy
>
>
>
>
>
> At 12:16 PM 1/26/2008, you wrote:
> >Kathy,
> >
> >I already have a tattoo in a place where size makes no difference.  I
got,
> >several years ago, a tattoo of a naked butterfly on top of my head and
right
> >in the middle of my bald spot, I mean, my thin spot.  Unless you are
taller
> >than I am, and can look down upon me, something many do already, you
can't
> >see it.  The rest of the time, I wear my cowboy hat so it is covered.
The
> >only person who has ever seen it is my barber and he's a liberal
Christian
> >so he thinks it's cute.  So do I but then what do I know.  I will refrain
> >from mentioning where I am considering getting the second tattoo.
> >
> >Phil.
> >
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 9:57 AM
> >Subject: Re: Personal Opinion
> >
> >
> > > Phil,
> > > About the tatoo, you might want to wait until your body is the size
> > > and shape you want it to be.  Changing body shape is bad for tatoos.
> > > Kathy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 11:25 AM 1/26/2008, you wrote:
> > > >Kathy,
> > > >
> > > >I knew I could count on you.
> > > >
> > > >Phil.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > >From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 6:21 AM
> > > >Subject: Re: Personal Opinion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Phil,
> > > > > The danglies would look great with the cowboy hat and boots.  You
> > > > > know, thought, to be truly biblical, you can't go to an ear ring
> > > > > place and use one of those cute little guns, you're supposed to
use a
> > > > > nail and a door post.  I suppose that you could use a little
rubbing
> > > > > alcohol afterwords, to keep it clean.  Good luck with that!
> > > > > Kathy
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 11:25 PM 1/25/2008, you wrote:
> > > > > >I am considering getting my ears pierced and was wondering what
your
> > > >opinion
> > > > > >was related to a Christian man having his ears pierced?  I've
heard
> >it is
> > > > > >Biblical based upon a slave wishing to stay with a master
> >permanently,
> > > > > >rendering is total life to the slave owner, and outwardly
> >demonstrating
> > > >his
> > > > > >allegiance to that man.  An excellent spiritual picture of a bond
> >slave
> > > >for
> > > > > >Christ.  So, what do you think?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Phil.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2