ECHURCH-USA Archives

The Electronic Church

ECHURCH-USA@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
The Electronic Church <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peggy Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:39:16 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Peggy Kern <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Well, you saved me from doing an internet search myself, which I was just 
considering doing.  <grin>

Peggy
http://kernsac.livejournal.com/
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: Important Question To Ponder


> My extensive internet search on the topic of why we have earlobes is of 
> the
> consensus that scientists believe that earlobes are a generic flaw, that 
> is,
> and evolutionary oversight and that there is no real purpose for that 
> extra
> piece of skin hanging below your ear.  No one seemed to recommend cutting 
> it
> off, of course, but rather to using it for earrings or sexual erogenous
> preasure as described by some.  Boy, what a waist of reading article after
> article after the last couple of days.
>
> Phil.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2