BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Nov 2007 21:46:38 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (91 lines)
I'm surprised it hasn't already happened, but I   think it won't be a
matter of if but when





On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Chris Schulte wrote:

> Well, in all honesty, I don't think too many amateurs are interested in
> using it, and we'll miss it when the FCC takes it away from us.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 6:11 PM
> Subject: Re: thf-6a question
>
>
> >I  know, and I don't know what will or would increase interest in that
> > band.  Even for land mobile use it isn't that popular, and there have been
> > a few articles in MRT about the 220 band, but no interest.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Chris Schulte wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah, it's in the ham band, but you were wondering if it was being used
> >> if I
> >> read what you were asking correctly, and in my oppinion, that's probably
> >> what it should be used for.  Noone talks on that band anymore which is a
> >> shame.
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:54 PM
> >> Subject: Re: thf-6a question
> >>
> >>
> >> > That is the 222-225 band right?  220-222 is a land mobile band and in
> >> > the
> >> > Detroit and Kalamazoo areas there are trunked systems using ACSSB on
> >> > that
> >> > 220-222 portion, but 216-220 I thought was for maritime things or
> >> > something like that
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Chris Schulte wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Jeff, the independant repeater association here in Michigan uses 220
> >> >> for
> >> >> their remote link frequencies so they can have their statewide link
> >> >> system
> >> >> up and running.
> >> >>
> >> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:27 PM
> >> >> Subject: Re: thf-6a question
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >I think it is narrow something like 12.5, but I'm not sure.  Do you
> >> >> >or
> >> >> > anyone hear anything on that band?  I've never heard anything there
> >> >> > nor
> >> >> > here in Arkansas or back home except maybe some data.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, don bishop wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Does anyone happen to know the default frequency tuning step for
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> 216 MHz band (b band) on the thf-6a?  I'm sure it's in the docs
> >> >> >> somewhere, but sure can't find it.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Don W6SMB
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2