and I gotta tell you glenn was a solid 40 over 9 to me without too much
fuss, and he was a good 30 km away.
Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude
On 21/03/2008 12:42 AM, the old scribe known as Shaun Oliver was able to
impart this pearl of wisdom:
> hmmm. a turner plus 3 hand mic on a kenwood 120s.
> that would be a rather ballsy sound.
> I had a friend back in my chocolate box days, had one of those on a
> yaesu ft101e and that thing had balls. don't think he ever got his ham
> license but god that radio use to sound nice..
> he would use a little bit of processor along with just enough gain on
> the mic itself to get that grunt I'm just about salivating over. and
> you'd know when he keyed up too because he had this destinctive clunk.
>
> Shaun
> web sites:
> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
> skype: brailledude
>
>
> On 21/03/2008 12:36 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>> I just got my TS-120 on the air, I'll use it to talk to the locals on 10
>> meters at night for a while to make sure everything's as it should be, I'm
>> very happy with it so far though with the turner plus 3 mic on it. I get
>> great reports so far.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 9:27 AM
>> Subject: Re: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>
>>
>>> reason I asked is because I'm looking at a yaesu ft201 on saturday and
>>> am curious to see if the same principal applies.
>>> I'd hold out for a kenwood 120v or even a 120s or something of that era,
>>> hell, even a yaesu ft7, but, there doesn't seem to be too many of them
>>> wanting to be sold. hi hi.
>>>
>>> Shaun
>>> web sites:
>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>> skype: brailledude
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/03/2008 12:05 AM, the old scribe known as John Miller was able to
>>> impart this pearl of wisdom:
>>>> That's true with *some* of them. I think the TS-520 you can do that, and
>>>> some others I know but I know not all.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 4:24 AM
>>>> Subject: a curley question about valve transceivers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi, I've heard it said that if one removes one of the finals from an
>>>>> amateur transceiver, one is able to cut the maximum output power down to
>>>>> aprox 30 watts pep. firstly, is this correct?
>>>>> and if it is, does it matter which final you remove, and secondly, if
>>>>> it's not correct, which I highly suspect is the case, would it just
>>>>> render the transceiver inoperable until the valve was replaced?
>>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Shaun
>>>>> web sites:
>>>>> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>>>>> http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>>>>> skype: brailledude
>>>>>
>>>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>>>
>>>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2963 (20080320) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
|
