Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:46:45 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks, John. Maybe I'll just un-install 5.35 and re-install it again
with the classic option, and see what happens.
73 de Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: winamp
>I did, now I actually have version 5.51
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: winamp
>
>
>> John:
>>
>> Do you have version 5.35?
>>
>> That's the one I seem to be having trouble with.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler: Kb8TYJ
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:12 AM
>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>
>>
>>>I use the current version and don't have nay problems, but in the
>>> installation just select the classic skin and you'll be fine. Only
>>> problem
>>> I
>>> have is when I close winamp it takes aim out with it, but I went back a
>>> few
>>> versions once to see if that helped it and it didn't so I just stick
>>> with
>>> the latest since I have no problems with it other than that which I have
>>> absolutely no fix for.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "T Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:09 AM
>>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks, John.
>>>>
>>>> Are you guys having the best luck with winamp 5.13?
>>>>
>>>> Should I just do the basic or classic installation?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, and 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 9:53 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: winamp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> oldversion.com has older versions of winamp
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|