BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Jan 2008 12:01:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Hi.

I think this is just a regional issue in California and Massachusetts.  I 
haven't heard anything about closing down the band elsewhere.

73, de Lou K2LKK



At 11:13 AM 12/30/2007 -0500, you wrote:
>I hope not.
>
>I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.
>
>73 De Anthony W2AJV
>[log in to unmask]
>ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
>Subject: 440
>
>
> > Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my =
> > radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it sure =
> > makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to be shut =
> > down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen next to 440?=20
> >
> > from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date: 1/1/2008 
>12:09 PM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2