Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:27:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That blows! hey ruses! W B 6 H E F HERE.
Curt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: C-Crane New SW Radio
One thing I found, it won't receive ssb.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: C-Crane New SW Radio
> Hi Ron, I got the impression that the short-wave portion of that radio is
> just an extention of what is there. Is there any radio out there that
> will tune both VHF and UHF TV well, with the exception of there being a
> scanner or HT that will do this? I heard varied reports on that radio.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Ron Canazzi wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> Lately, I have been hearing advertisements for the new C-Crane SW. This
>> is
>> supposedly a newer version of the C-Crane (CC Radio Plus) receiver. Has
>> anyone purchased or had any experience with this newer radio?
>>
>> I have a C-Crane or CC Radio plus radio--and while it is certainly not
>> the
>> oft times touted "best AM Radio in the world", it is a decent AM receiver
>> and at least in my area, has above average FM reception with little
>> multi-path interference. The Weather band and alert features are
>> adequate
>> and the TV band is a throw-in which receives a lot of interference and
>> receives only the strongest local VHF stations (no UHF.) Other people
>> who
>> have purchased the original CC Radio plus have had varying degrees of
>> complaints--which makes me believe that quality control may be an issue
>> with
>> that company.
>>
>> At $149.95, the price seems reasonable for short-wave--assuming that the
>> short-wave is at least clean enough for average usage.
>>
>> What does anyone think?
>>
>> The Scourge Of Authoritarianism Is Intellectualism
>>
>
|
|
|