I think Ron Paul looks good.

earlier, Phil Scovell, wrote:

>Kathy,
>
>He was complimentary, Rush was that is, concerning the voters but it just
>sounded to me that he was trying to say Christian voters were not as true of
>conservatives but voted more based upon their religious beliefs.  I watch
>Bill O'o'Riley often and he seems to imply the same.  It makes me believe
>these guys because Christians, when compared to other conservatives, can't
>see the forest for the trees.  Frankly, I'm partly libertarian in some of my
>political beliefs, believe it or not, so I bristle any time I think someone
>is saying I support someone just because I'm a Christian and he's a
>Christian, too.  For example, as much as Mormon theology freaks me out, if
>Romney turned out to be the repub nominee, if he truly is pro life now,
>although he wasn't before, that is one big time issue that would allow me to
>vote for him, although I would have other criteria in the mix before I made
>up my mind.  On the other hand, I'll never vote for Juliani, or however he
>spells his name, because he believes in letting people decide to kill their
>unborn children and although he carries a gun himself, he doesn't believe
>common citizens have a right to protect themselves in the same manner.
>That's just for starters.  He has a whole boat load of things that makes me
>wonder why he is even a republican in the first place.  I sort of laughed
>last night when they interview Pat Robertson on Fox news.  He said the Lord
>had indeed told him who was going to be the next president but he refused to
>say because he hoped he was wrong.  I have learned, concerning Rush, to read
>between the lines, to some degree, because he isn't exactly what he appears
>to be.  I find the same to be true with O'Riley.  Frankly, I wish all the
>primaries were over and we could see who is left standing so we could find
>out what the candidates really believe.  Is that possible?  Bush dropped the
>ball somewhere along the line in some respects but I'd still rather have him
>the than any of the current Dems.  I'd probably vote for Lieberman, on the
>other hand, if he were running but I don't know what his abortion position
>is but since he isn't running, I don't care what it is.  I don't care what
>party a person is, I will not vote for anyone who believes in killing the
>unborn.  Call me a one issue conservative if you like but 50 million murders
>cannot be morally justifiable for a country, Christian or not.  I'm a one
>issue Christian when it comes to salvation, so I guess I can be a one issue
>voter, too, if I have to be.
>
>Phil.
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kathy Du Bois" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 4:49 AM
>Subject: Re: Who Are Evangelicals?
>
>
> > Interesting Phil,
> > I happened to catch a lot of Rush on Friday as well, but I think I
> > came away with a different take.  Oh well.
> > Kathy
> >
> >
> >
> > At 05:28 PM 1/4/2008, you wrote:
> > >I think I figured it out by listening to Rush today.  Of course, Rush is
>mad
> > >at Huckabee in the first place but he is definitely hacked off he won
>Iowa.
> > >A definite political drop in the bucket, even if I was born there, but a
>win
> > >nonetheless.  Other than that, I have spent quite awhile today listening
>to
> > >Rush insist that Huckabee won only due to those who are not true
> > >conservative voters, that is, the evangelical Christians that pulled
> > >Huckabee through.  At first, this odd political analysis made me feel
>funny
> > >coming from someone that has been, quote, the conservative leader of the
> > >world for decades, unquote, but then I remembered how mad I was when Rush
> > >pushed NAFTA so much years ago.  Look what we now have for that?  Jobs
>out
> > >sourced to all points of the globe, including our Enemies, and we now
>also
> > >are spending our tax dollars to support non American citizens in school,
> > >their health care, unpaid health care, driver's licenses, jobs, which
> > >Americans won't do we are told, and free refrigerators, washers, driers,
> > >subsidized housing, and at the same time, they don't even need to speak
> > >English or read it and some even want them to vote.  Even so come Lord
> > >Jesus.
> > >
> > >Phil.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1210 - Release Date: 
>1/5/2008 11:46 AM
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1210 - Release Date: 
>1/5/2008 11:46 AM

John


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1210 - Release Date: 1/5/2008 11:46 AM