BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:51:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi;
You might get a used nontalking meter which by itself is useless to you and 
connect a tone unit to it rather than the meter in the radio.
Richard
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: valve radios revisited


can't afford an ldg talking watt meter. $199 but haven't got that much
to spare. 500 oxford scollars has gotta see me get a radio a license and
an antenna.

Shaun
web sites:
http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
skype: brailledude


On 20/03/2008 12:27 AM, the old scribe known as Howard Kaufman was able
to impart this pearl of wisdom:
> I'd trust the attenuated rx more than the marked knobs.  Something like 
> rain
> might change the tuning, and your marks wouldn't be accureate.  I don't 
> know
> why you are trying to read the internal meter, rather than the watt meter
> outside the radio.  If you do it that way, you have a system that you can
> use to tune any radio, not just one.
>
>
> __________ NOD32 2959 (20080319) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2