Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:46:27 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Well, right off, if you do packet the way I do, there's no mailbox in the
built in TNC's and they lack in a ton of settings. For APRS, packet cluster,
and just general playing around and conversing they're alright but really,
they're very barebones. The TNC in my TS-2000, for what I do, doesn't even
compare with the KPC3+ I use on packet, in fact it wouldn't even make a good
backup. For the Packet cluster, for DX spots, it's great and I know a few
people using them on APRS which we can't really do, but really beyond that
you're better off with a separate packet station if you're going to really
be active on packet.
----- Original Message -----
From: "matt v" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:24 PM
Subject: radios with and w/o tnc
> hi
> is there an advantage to these radios with tnc built in, other than the =
> obvious not having to buy a separate tnc. anyone used one and what are =
> the advantages/disadvantages of these
>
|
|
|