Hi Steve;

Your absolutely right.

I mean the transmit audio is just not what I'm accustomed to hearing.

Anthony


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: ts480


> Anthony,
>
> The problem with the TX audio is that the widest filter you have on SSB is
> 2.4KHz.  To me, that's the most important difference between the TS480 and
> the TS2000.  I wish somebody would come up with a mod for changing that
> filter width.
>
> Steve
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 17:49
> Subject: Re: ts480
>
>
>> Hi Richard;
>>
>> You can really get away without the filters.
>>
>> First of all, the filters have to be soldered in.
>>
>> Could you believe it in this day an age?
>>
>> When I had mine I didn't find I needed the filters.
>>
>> My main complaint with  the radio is that the audio output from the
>> transmitter does not have that Kenwood footprint.
>>
>> Even with the software, I wasn't able to open the audio out to 3.0
>>
>> As I said in an earlier post, I'm going to wait and see what Kenwood 
>> comes
>> out with next.
>>
>> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
>> [log in to unmask]
>> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Richard Fiorello" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:57 AM
>> Subject: ts480
>>
>>
>>> Hi Tom and list;
>>> I believe wires four and five are reversed for the ts480.  I have heard
>>> rf
>>> complaints concerning the mc60 and wonder what else works well.
>>> As for the 480, I have generally purchased new radios and had the seller
>>> install voice board and filters.  Lazy I admit it.  I have seen a few
>>> ts480s
>>> used and wonder how much of a pain filter and speech installation is?
>>> Most
>>> used ones are just the radios no filters and no speech.
>>> Richard
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>