I know people that use those turners all the time, they work fine on hf
radios, pretty much any of them honestly.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: tuner
>I don't know about impedence, but I've used turner mikes on older and
> newer tranceivers for years. Turners were made for solid state cb rigs.
> They sound great. D 104 without a preamp, yes, you're right, they are
> high impedence. Even those with the built in preamp work fine.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr
>
> On Wed, 4
> Jul 2007, Pat Byrne wrote:
>
>> Those mikes are the wrong impedance for the transceiver. Not an
>> uncommon problem.At 09:01 AM 7/4/2007, you wrote:
>>> Incidentally the radio won't take any mike I hook to it. I have a few
>>> turner
>>> mikes, some old estatic mikes that aren't made anymore, and the old
>>> school
>>> silver eagle. The icom didn't like any of those. That's asahame since I
>>> miss
>>> using those mikes.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:49 AM
>>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh yeah, if the SM-8 won't drive it it must be out of adjustment, that's
>>> a
>>> normally hard driving mic. Not an overly bad radio but I'd be careful
>>> getting it fixed, I see those sold all the time for under $400 in great
>>> shape. It might not be worth a lot to fix it though just putting it back
>>> in
>>> adjustment probably won't be too bad for you.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Kevin Kwan" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 9:34 AM
>>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>>
>>>
>>>> Since this guy's talking about the 735 I'm glad in a way. I can't find
>>>> too
>>>> many friends that use it. Mine needs some real readjusting. I bought it
>>>> from
>>>> a guy who used it for cb. He told me the radio was good. He said I'm
>>>> paying
>>>> a lot less than he paid for it. I got it for 200 dollars. Then a
>>>> sighted
>>>> friend help me hook it to ham deluxe so I can program it with jaws.
>>>> Actually, it uses Microsoft marry. I found out way later that my radio
>>>> was
>>>> past around from one cb person to another and they butchered it. The
>>>> audio
>>>> on it for a m sucks. The microphone for it, the f m 8 hardly puts out
>>>> any
>>>> audio. I know that's not normal. I'll keep the radio because it is
>>>> still
>>>> useable, but I'm very disappointed at having to take it in to have it
>>>> looked
>>>> at one day. That's gonna cost me and I'm not happy about that.
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 2:17 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> The Icom 735 came out after the 751A and used the AT150 auto tuner from
>>>> Icom. I found that with the antennas that I have, the AT200 Pro was
>>>> only
>>>> slightly better than the AT180, but since I already had the AT180 when
>>>> LDG
>>>> introduced the AT200 Pro, and since I never had the interface for the
>>>> Icom
>>>> (I used it for a short time on the TS2000S), I still have the AT180.
>>>> It
>>>> does seem like Icom's prices on their auto tuners is rather excessive
>>>> though, but then, one could say that about most accessories from Icom.
>>>>
>>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At 09:36 PM 7/3/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>> I actually think the LDG is better than the 180, as do many, which is
>>>>> why
>>>>> I
>>>>> never bought the at180. I know the 735 has that hookup in the back,
>>>>> not
>>>> sure
>>>>> what year that is, but the 761 icom, I don't recall seeing it on that
>>>>> radio
>>>>> in the local EOC though it might have just been missed.
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 8:31 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: tuner
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect that it might pre-date that as that was a 1980's radio.
>>>>>> But,
>>>>>> that was what I was alluding to in my last message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure when Icom started doing that, but I know that both my
>>>> TS690S
>>>>>> and my TS2000S will support the Kenwood interface. I never bought
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Icom
>>>>>> interface for the MFJ because I always found the Icom AT180 to be
>>>>>> sufficient. Of course, it should be for what Icom asks for those
>>>> kiddos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Lou K2LKK
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At 05:15 PM 7/3/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>>>> I'd wonder if you can get a cable like the one for the 706 where you
>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>> hook it right to the radio, that's slick but I don't know if your
>>>>>>> radio
>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>> the tuner hookup on the back.
>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 4:58 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: tuner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I got the tuner in. I was surprised that it didn't come with an ac
>>>>>>>> adaptor like the tw-01 watt meter. I'll get someone with vision to
>>>>>>>> assist mein connecting it. o I=20
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>>>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date:
>>>>>>> 7/3/2007
>>>>>>> 10:02 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>>>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>>>>> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>>>> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/885 - Release Date:
>>>>> 7/3/2007
>>>>> 10:02 AM
>>>>
>>>> Louis Kim Kline
>>>> A.R.S. K2LKK
>>>> Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Work Telephone: (585) 697-5753
>>
|
