I know, and I don't know what will or would increase interest in that
band. Even for land mobile use it isn't that popular, and there have been
a few articles in MRT about the 220 band, but no interest.
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Chris Schulte wrote:
> Yeah, it's in the ham band, but you were wondering if it was being used if I
> read what you were asking correctly, and in my oppinion, that's probably
> what it should be used for. Noone talks on that band anymore which is a
> shame.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:54 PM
> Subject: Re: thf-6a question
>
>
> > That is the 222-225 band right? 220-222 is a land mobile band and in the
> > Detroit and Kalamazoo areas there are trunked systems using ACSSB on that
> > 220-222 portion, but 216-220 I thought was for maritime things or
> > something like that
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Chris Schulte wrote:
> >
> >> Jeff, the independant repeater association here in Michigan uses 220 for
> >> their remote link frequencies so they can have their statewide link
> >> system
> >> up and running.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2007 5:27 PM
> >> Subject: Re: thf-6a question
> >>
> >>
> >> >I think it is narrow something like 12.5, but I'm not sure. Do you or
> >> > anyone hear anything on that band? I've never heard anything there nor
> >> > here in Arkansas or back home except maybe some data.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, don bishop wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Does anyone happen to know the default frequency tuning step for the
> >> >> 216 MHz band (b band) on the thf-6a? I'm sure it's in the docs
> >> >> somewhere, but sure can't find it.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >>
> >> >> Don W6SMB
> >> >>
> >>
>
|