it would be better to use twin feder.
you can then use terminal block to make the connections, and enclose the
whole in self amalgamating tape.
DAVID
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Louis Kim Kline
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 4:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: More on the 80/40 Inverted Vees
Hi.
Enough to make a decent connection. We fashioned our own center insulator,
but you could get one of the commercially made center insulators with an
SO239 conector molded into the insulator. That would be the simplest way
to do it because then allyou need to do is put a PL259 on the end of your
coax, and attache one leg of the 75 meter and one leg of the 40 meter
inverted vee to one terminal on the insulator and attach the other leg of
the 75 and the other leg of the 40 meter inverted vee to the other
terminal. Make sure that you get or make the kind of insulator that has
some way to hang the insulator off of your mast and if the wires have any
possibility of touching the mast, make sure that you have some type of
insulating material covering the wire. It is best to try to tension the
vees such that the insulator is offset from the mast by a couple of
inches. Also make sure that whatever you do that you seal your connections
thoroughly--regardless of whether you make a direct connection between the
wires and the coax or buy a commercially made insulator with a connector,
water will be your enemy and will easily make its way into the coax if you
don't seal it six ways to Sunday.
As for best practices for sealing connections, that could start a whole
other discussion. Whatever you do, keep in mind that the approach you take
must stand up to extremes of temperature, moisture, and ultra violet light
exposure.
73, de Lou K2LKK
At 01:52 PM 3/30/2008 +1000, you wrote:
>how much exposed center conductor and brade do you need to accomplish
>this? or do you attach some kind of connector to be able to spread the
>wires far enough apart.
>
>Shaun
>web sites:
>http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>http://blindman.homelinux.org/~blindman/
>skype: brailledude
>
>
>On 30/03/2008 1:49 PM, the old scribe known as Louis Kim Kline was able
>to impart this pearl of wisdom:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I forgot to mention the reason why I made them perpendicular to each
> > other. It is very simple, really. When they are perpendicular, there
is
> > almost no coupling between the antennas, and that greatly simplifies
> tuning
> > the antennas for resonance on 3800 KHz and 7100 KHz. If you fan them,
> they
> > will interact with each other a little, and you'll end up fudging the
> > tuning a little. They still work, but keeping them perpendicular is
just
> > easier and cleaner.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
> >
> >
> > __________ NOD32 2984 (20080329) Information __________
> >
> > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG.
>Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1350 - Release Date: 3/30/2008
>12:32 PM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1349 - Release Date: 29/03/2008
17:02
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.1/1349 - Release Date: 29/03/2008
17:02
|