BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:52:50 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
Lou and list

I completely agree with you Lou.

I use the FT1000mp without issues.

I use an old DOS program to run it for shack purposes and TR for contesting
from which I can switch VFOs, filters and more.

I operated the CQWW contest last year for 36 of the 48 hours without even
touching the rig!

Frankly, I find that that too much speech from my TS2000 interferes when
quickly changing band or frequency when chasing DX or contesting.
It is fine for rag chew situations - but I don't do much of that!

David



-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Lou Kolb
Sent: 23 November 2007 02:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ReModern Radios and Accessibility

John,

You comment often on Yaesu's failure rate and I wouldn't dispute your
experience with it.  But it doesn't mirror my own.  I've had limited
experience using yaesu gear but I know several hams in my region, some of
them blind, who not only use Yaesu gear like the ft1000 series but swear by
it.   The only rig I'm consistently hearing complaints about is that new
Yaesu rig and I can't recall the model number right off the top of my head.
I just thinnk we tend to paint with too broad a brush sometimes when it
comes to both accessibility and reliability.  Lou

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: ReModern Radios and Accessibility


> 1 of Yaesu's biggest problems as big if not bigger than the lack of
> accessibility is that about 75% of the people I know who've bought one in
> the last 5 or so years, had to send them back for repairs including 6
> FT-2000s in the last 4 months, 3 FT9000's among other HF radios and duel
> band mobiles, all under a year old, most under a month old. That many is a
> very serious issue to me. Few of the same model having the same symptoms
> though the bad ft-8800 or FT-8900, I'm not sure which those are, all did
> have the same problem but one. Their attitudes don't help things at all
and
> those are the reasons I'll probably never have another one here, nor will
I
> recommend them, but I will continue to actively campaigned against them.
I'd
> rather my TS-520 I bought to play around with before any modern yaesu, or
> any because I don't like to display that name if it might be seen in my
> station or something though my FT-51 does make a rare appearance still.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 6:46 PM
> Subject: Re: ReModern Radios and Accessibility
>
>
> > Well said Colin; many of us have had radios that were, "in a perfect
> > world" inaccessible as can be, but we made do.  My maybe worst ever
> > from an accessibility standpoint handheld was a Yaesu 727
> > handheld.  But it was the first truly syntehsized, dual band handheld
> > in town and damn it, I wanted ont!!  Eventually and overall we became
> > friends!!  My current Kenwood is lots easier to work but I still had
> > fun with my old Yaesu.
> > Isn't always a perfect world.
> > Pat, K9JAU
>

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.3/1144 - Release Date: 21/11/2007
16:28
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.3/1144 - Release Date: 21/11/2007
16:28
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2