and this list has such crazy high traffic that the grouping of threads and
messages is vital?
I typically read every message from this group simply because there really
aren't very many and since I know that sometimes things can go off topic
without a subject being changed, and the whole reason I am on this list is
to learn and find out new things.
perhaps I am of the minority in that.
but thanks for changing the subject line, perhaps you'll have to change it
again to reflect talking about changing subject lines...heaven forbid
someone should open up a message about low loss coax and find out it is
about changed subject lines...wait a second, did you not just commit the
crime you requested not be committed, you used low loss coax as the subject,
but then didn't mention it at all but railed about subject lines and the
terrible inconvenience that occurs when they do not perfectly reflect the
content of the messages.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: Low Loss Coax
> Hey guys, maybe somebody should take the trouble to change the subject
line when
> the discussion isn't about the 480 and 2000 any longer.
>
> I just did.
>
> But, it would be nice for those of us who group messages and don't
necessarily
> read every message.
>
> Steve, K8SP
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob - KA5ETA" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 7:00 PM
> Subject: Re: TS480 and TS2000 comparison needed for HF
>
>
> Are you thinking about rg174? It is small but I thought it was lossy.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: TS480 and TS2000 comparison needed for HF
>
>
> it seems to me that I remember hearing about a specific UHF coax that is
> used for anything from 800 and up...a rather small diameter, but nearly
> lossless...
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 1:11 PM
> Subject: Re: TS480 and TS2000 comparison needed for HF
>
>
> > I'm not sure what they're using mobile, 1 guy I know has LMR400 in a
very
> > short run. I know someone else using something, I forget what he called
it
> > but it looks like RG8U but supposedly it's lower loss, only a 10 foot
run
> or
> > so which isn't much loss. What most people run though I'm not sure, I do
> > know it's not RG58 though. You lose almost 100% of your signal in a
short
> > run of that and it will heat up and melt as someone around here found
out
> > with a 1 foot test piece.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 2:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: TS480 and TS2000 comparison needed for HF
> >
> >
> > > the cool thing about 900MHZ is you can easily put up a beam with huge
> > > amounts of gain and it won't take up much space at all.
> > > Even stacked arrays would be within the relm of possibility on my push
> up
> > > just because of the small foot print and weight factors.
> > > We don't currently have any voice operations on 900MHZ in my area, but
> > > they
> > > are seriously looking into D star and 1.2GHZ voice and data repeaters.
> > > What is the typical mobile coax used for 900MHZ setups?
> > > I can't imagine they would use hard line in a mobile?
> > > 73
> > > Colin, V A6BKX
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:22 PM
> > > Subject: Re: TS480 and TS2000 comparison needed for HF
> > >
> > >
> > >> I was surprised when I looked at the directory, not that there's a
lot
> > >> but
> > > I
> > >> know of at least 2 more going up and I guess they're working on a
> linked
> > >> system here. That should be pretty cool if it all works out, maybe
get
> a
> > > few
> > >> 2 meter machines involved here and there or 440 machines that are
> allowed
> > > to
> > >> stay. It will be fun if it all works out.
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > >> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 1:50 PM
> > >> Subject: Re: TS480 and TS2000 comparison needed for HF
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > Hi.
> > >> >
> > >> > I actually wouldn't mind trying out 900 MHz if there were some
other
> > >> > activity in this area, but in Rochester, NY, all I would hear most
> > > likely
> > >> > is white noise. I'd probably have to put in a substantial enough
> > > antenna
> > >> > to reach Toronto before I would have any reasonable expectation of
> > > working
> > >> > anybody.
> > >> >
> > >> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > At 08:01 AM 11/16/2007 -0800, you wrote:
> > >> >>What I've played with 900 here, it isn't nearly as good as 440.
Much
> > > more
> > >> >>easily blocked by buildings and such and very unpredictable as far
as
> > >> >>coverage. Also very fluttery as it has a much shorter wave length.
> > >> >>One
> > >> >>problem is it takes a totally separate radio. Kind of like 220.
> > >> >>73s
> > >> >>Butch Bussen
> > >> >>wa0vjr
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>--
> > >> >>No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >> >>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> >>Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1136 - Release Date:
> > >> >>11/17/2007 2:55 PM
> > >> >
> > >> > Louis Kim Kline
> > >> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > >> > Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > >> > Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > >> > Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > >> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1135 - Release Date:
> > > 11/16/2007 10:58 PM
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1135 - Release Date:
> 11/16/2007 10:58 PM
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.0/1136 - Release Date:
11/17/2007 2:55 PM
>
>
|
